First Appellate District Court Records

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: AFFIRMED IN FULL; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL; PUBLICATION STATUS: SIGNED UNPUBLISHED; AUTHOR: GOLDMAN, JEREMY M.; PARTICIPANTS: STREETER, JON B. (CONCUR) CLAY, JASON ANTHONY (CONCUR)

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: AFFIRMED IN FULL; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL THE ORDER DENYING BARRETT'S PETITION FOR RESENTENCING IS AFFIRMED.; PUBLICATION STATUS: SIGNED UNPUBLISHED; AUTHOR: STEWART, THERESE M.; PARTICIPANTS: DESAUTELS, TARA M. (CONCUR) RICHMAN, JAMES A. (CONCUR)

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: SERVICE COPY OF PETITION FOR REVIEW RECEIVED.; NOTES: S292512

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: AFFIRMED IN FULL; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL THE DENIAL OF APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR RESENTENCING IS AFFIRMED.; PUBLICATION STATUS: SIGNED UNPUBLISHED; AUTHOR: SIMONS, MARK B.; PARTICIPANTS: BURNS, GORDON B. (CONCUR) JACKSON, TERI L. (CONCUR)

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: AFFIRMED IN FULL; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL THE JUDGMENT IS AFFIRMED.; PUBLICATION STATUS: SIGNED UNPUBLISHED; AUTHOR: MILLER, MARLA J.; PARTICIPANTS: STEWART, THERESE M. (CONCUR) RICHMAN, JAMES A. (CONCUR)

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: ***JURISDICTIONAL ORDER DUE***.; NOTES: PUBLICATION

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: AFFIRMED IN FULL; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL THE ORDER DENYING ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND DISMISSING THE ACTION IS AFFIRMED; PUBLICATION STATUS: SIGNED UNPUBLISHED; AUTHOR: LANGHORNE WILSON, MONIQUE; PARTICIPANTS: SMILEY III, CHARLES A. (CONCUR) HUMES, JAMES M. (CONCUR)

DESCRIPTION: GRANT REQUEST TO CONTINUE ORAL ARGUMENT.; NOTES: BY THE COURT: IN LIGHT OF RESPONDENTS' REQUEST TO CONTINUE THE ORAL ARGUMENT HEARING, THE HEARING IS HEREBY CONTINUED FROM THE OCTOBER 21, 2025 CALENDAR. THE NEW HEARING DATE IS NOVEMBER 21, 2025, WITH THE TIME TO BE DETERMINED. ON OR ABOUT OCTOBER 31, 2025, AN ORDER WILL ISSUE SETTING THE TIME OF THE HEARING.

DESCRIPTION: REQUEST TO CONTINUE ORAL ARG - TO COURT.; NOTES: BY ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT BRIAN WORTHINGTON

DESCRIPTION: MAIL RETURNED, UNABLE TO FORWARD.; NOTES: COURT'S ORDER CONTINUING ORAL ARGUMENT TO ATTORNEY JEFFREY BILS; TRUEFILING BOUNCE DETAILS - FOUND INACTIVE ADDRESSES: JEFFREY.BILS@WILSHIRELAWIFIRM.COM. INACTIVE RECIPIENTS ARE ONES THAT HAVE GENERATED A HARD BOUNCE, A SPAM COMPLAINT, OR A MANUAL SUPPRESSION. SMTP;550 5.1.2 ERROR: BAD DESTINATION SYSTEM: NO SUCH DOMAIN *EMAIL HANDLE CORRECTED TO @WILSHIRELAWFIRM IN

DESCRIPTION: GRANT REQUEST TO CONTINUE ORAL ARGUMENT.; NOTES: BY THE COURT: APPELLANT'S SEPTEMBER 24, 2025 UNOPPOSED REQUEST TO CONTINUE ORAL ARGUMENT IS GRANTED. ORAL ARGUMENT FOR THE ABOVE-ENTITLED CAUSE, ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD ON THIS COURT'S OCTOBER 23, 2025 CALENDAR IS ORDERED RESCHEDULED AND WILL INSTEAD BE HEARD ON THE COURT'S DECEMBER 18, 2025 CALENDAR. COUNSEL WILL BE NOTIFIED UPON THE DETERMINATION OF THE EXACT TIME ORAL ARGUMENT WILL TAKE PLACE.

DESCRIPTION: ORAL ARGUMENT RESCHEDULED; NOTES: OCTOBER 23, 2025 AT 9:00 A.M.

DESCRIPTION: FILED DOCUMENT ENTITLED:; NOTES: ORAL ARGUMENT APPEARANCE; DAVID A. KAISER, ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT; IN-PERSON APPEARANCE

DESCRIPTION: VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL BY THE COURT: APPELLANT HAVING FILED AN ABANDONMENT OF APPEAL IN THIS COURT, THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED AND THE REMITTITUR IS TO ISSUE FORTHWITH. APPELLANT'S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IS DENIED AS MOOT.

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: SOMETHING IS DUE; SEE NOTE.; NOTES: COUNSEL/PARTIES TO ADVISE IN WRITING OF APPEARANCE TYPE; NO RESPONSE DEFAULTS TO IN PERSON APPEARANCE

DESCRIPTION: FILED:; NOTES: LAURA VAVAKIN, ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT, INTENDS TO APPEAR REMOTELY

DESCRIPTION: REPLY FILED TO:

DESCRIPTION: SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF FILED BY:

DESCRIPTION: AUGMENTED RECORD FILED.; NOTES: (MISSING RTS FOR 1-28-19, 5-12-22, 9-28-23, 10-30-23, 1-22-24, 2-6-24, & 6-28-24; AND CT CONTAINING 6-8-18 PRETRIAL INFORMATION DISCOVERY REQUEST, JUROR QUESTIONNAIRES AND DEFENSE COUNSEL'S VISUAL AID USED DURING CLOSING ARGUMENT) SEE DECLARATION RECEIVED 8/27/25 FOR 10/24/18, 11/15/18, 12/7/18, 2/2/19 (FOR 2/7/19), 3/6/19 (FOR 3/8/19), 11/9/20, 9/20/22 AND 6/7/23 RT INFORMATION

DESCRIPTION: FILED AUGMENTED RECORD PURSUANT TO RULE 8.340.; NOTES: (CT COMPLAINT 2 DATED 1-25-19; CORRESPONDENCE W/DOCTOR'S NOTE FROM JUROR NO. 8 ON 3-11-24; CORRESPONDENT FROM JUROR NO. 9 ON 3-11-24; EXHIBIT LIST PROVIDED TO JURY IN RESPONSE TO REQUEST BY JUROR NO. 3 ON 3-6-24; PROBABLE CAUSE WARRANT FOR ARREST SIGNED BY JUDGE KOLAKOWSKI ON 5-15-18; PEOPLE'S EXHIBIT NOS. 11A, 12A, 13A, 23A, 24A, 28A, 38A, AND DEFENSE EXHIBIT H)

DESCRIPTION: CASE ON CONFERENCE LIST.

DESCRIPTION: RECORD TO COURT FOR REVIEW.

DESCRIPTION: SOMETHING IS DUE; SEE NOTE.; NOTES: ACTION ON APPELLANT'S UNOPPOSED RJN?

DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF.

DESCRIPTION: PETITION SUMMARILY DENIED BY ORDER; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL THE REQUEST FOR STAY AND PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE ARE DENIED.

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: PETITION DENIED OR DISMISSED AFTER ALTERNATIVE WRIT OR PALMA ISSUED.; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL ON MAY 31, 2023, REAL PARTY IN INTEREST FILED A LETTER STATING THAT, IN RESPONSE TO THIS COURT'S MAY 10, 2023 ALTERNATIVE WRIT ORDER, HE "FILED A REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT AND WILL PURSUE HIS CLAIMS AGAINST BREX, INC. IN THE COURTS OF DELAWARE." THE MAY 10TH ORDER DIRECTED THE SUPERIOR COURT TO ENTER A NEW ORDER GRANTING PETITION'S MOTION TO DISMISS OR STAY ACTION FOR IMPROPER FORUM, AND REAL PARTY'S DISMISSAL RENDERS THAT MOTION, AND THIS PETITION, MOOT. ACCORDINGLY, THE ALTERNATIVE WRIT IS DISCHARGED AND THE PETITION IS DISMISSED AS MOOT.

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL APPELLANT KIM GAZAWAY HAVING FILED A REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL ON FEBRUARY 25, 2022, THIS APPEAL IS HEREBY DISMISSED. THE CLERK OF THIS COURT IS DIRECTED TO CONCURRENTLY FILE THIS ORDER AND ISSUE THE REMITTITUR.

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: ABANDONMENT OF APPEAL FILED IN TRIAL COURT; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL

DESCRIPTION: ABANDONMENT OF APPEAL FILED IN TRIAL COURT.

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: CASE ON CONFERENCE LIST.; NOTES: 25-8.1

DESCRIPTION: ARGUMENT WAIVED BY: (NO RESPONSE - 10 DAY NOTICE)

DESCRIPTION: VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL BY THE COURT: APPELLANT'S REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL IS GRANTED. THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED, AND THE REMITTITUR SHALL ISSUE FORTHWITH.

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL APPELLANT HAS FILED AN ABANDONMENT OF APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED AND THE REMITTITUR WILL ISSUE IMMEDIATELY.

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: ORDER FILED.; NOTES: IN FEBRUARY 2024, THIS COURT DISMISSED THE APPEAL FILED BY ROBERT JACOBSEN AND JOHN BROSNAN (COLLECTIVELY, APPELLANTS) FOR LACK OF AN APPEALABLE ORDER. THE REMITTITUR ISSUED IN APRIL 2024. ON MAY 8, 2024, APPELLANTS FILED A REQUEST TO REINSTATE THE APPEAL. THE COURT CONSTRUES THE REQUEST AS A MOTION TO RECALL THE REMITTITUR; SO CONSTRUED, THE MOTION IS DENIED. (BRYAN V. BANK OF AMERICA (2001) 86 CAL.APP.4TH 185, 191-192 [DENYING MOTION TO RECALL THE REMITTITUR AND REINSTATE THE APPEAL WHERE APPELLANT "PRESENTED NO COGNIZABLE GROUND UPON WHICH THE EXTRAORDINARY REMEDY SHE SEEKS COULD PROPERLY BE ALLOWED"].)

DESCRIPTION: FILED:; NOTES: APPELLANT JACOBSEN'S REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT OF APPEAL (TREATED AS A MOTION TO RECALL THE REMITTITUR)

DESCRIPTION: NOTE:; NOTES: IS ABANDONMENT OF APPEAL HERE?

DESCRIPTION: EMAIL SENT TO:; NOTES: APPELLANT L. DIAMOND RE: YOU WILL HAVE TO PLACE YOUR REQUEST FOR A REFUND OF THE FILING FEE IN WRITING AND SUBMIT IT TO THE COURT. I CANNOT REFUND IT ON MY OWN.

DESCRIPTION: VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: SHIPPED TO STATE RETENTION CENTER, BOX # / LIST #:; NOTES: ENTIRE RECORD FILED ELECTRONICALLY

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: RESPONDENT'S BRIEF.

DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT'S APPENDIX FILED.; NOTES: VOL. 2 OF 2, PGS. 250-451

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: ORDER FILED.; NOTES: BY THE COURT: THE COURT HEREBY MODIFIES ITS ORDER OF JUNE 25, 2024, AS FOLLOWS: THIS COURT WAS NOTIFIED ON JUNE 24, 2024 OF THE DEATH OF APPELLANT B.S., AS VERIFIED BY A COPY OF THE DEATH CERTIFICATE. THE APPEAL IN CASE A169857 IS DISMISSED. CASE NUMBER A169688 (LAKE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT # JV320663) AS TO MOTHER D.S. SHALL REMAIN ACTIVE. THE CLERK OF THIS COURT SHALL FILE THIS ORDER IN CASE A169688.

DESCRIPTION: ABATEMENT OF APPEAL; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL BY THE COURT: THIS COURT HAVING BEEN NOTIFIED BY APPELLANT'S COUNSEL OF APPELLANT B. S.'S DEATH ON JUNE 24, 2024, AS VERIFIED BY A COPY OF THE DEATH CERTIFICATE, THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED. THE SUPERIOR COURT IS DIRECTED TO ENTER AN ORDER PERMANENTLY ABATING ALL PROCEEDINGS IN LAKE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CASE NUMBER JV320663. (IN RE JACKSON (1985) 39 CAL.3D 464, 480; PEOPLE V. DAIL (1943) 22 CAL.2D 642, 659.)

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: OTHER INVOLUNTARY DISMISSAL; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL BY THE COURT: APPELLANT'S ATTORNEY FILED A BRIEF WITH THIS COURT ON JULY 9, 2025, INDICATING THERE ARE NO ARGUABLE ISSUES. APPELLANT C.J. HAS FAILED TO RESPOND TO OUR LETTER OF JULY 9, 2025, GIVING HER THE OPPORTUNITY TO STATE ANY ISSUES SHE FEELS SHOULD BE REVIEWED ON APPEAL. THE APPEAL IS THEREFORE DISMISSED. (IN RE PHOENIX H. (2009) 47 CAL.4TH 835.)

DESCRIPTION: REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT FILED BY:; NOTES: HERB FOX, ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT, REQUESTS ORAL ARGUMENT

DESCRIPTION: ORAL ARGUMENT WAIVER NOTICE SENT.

DESCRIPTION: OTHER INVOLUNTARY DISMISSAL; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL BY THE COURT: BECAUSE NEITHER COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER NOR PETITIONER ACTING ALONE HAS FILED A PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY WRIT WITHIN THE TIME PERMITTED (CAL. RULES OF COURT, RULE 8.452(C)(1)), THE ABOVE-ENTITLED ACTION IS DISMISSED AS ABANDONED. (KARL S. V. SUPERIOR COURT (1995) 34 CAL.APP.4TH 1397, 1403-1404.)

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: RECORD ON APPEAL FILED.

DESCRIPTION: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - COURT REPORTER OR ATTY.

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED IN SUPREME COURT.

DESCRIPTION: RECEIVED COPY OF:; NOTES: S290382

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.