24-531
01/31/2024
Open
Civil
Plaintiff
GANIYU AYINLA JAIYEOLA
Defendants
APPLE INC.
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC.
T-MOBILE US, INC.
AT&T INC.
Plaintiff Attorney
Ganiyu Ayinla Jaiyeola
Defendant Attorneys
Sara T. Schneider
Pavel Ekmekchyan
Mr. Joshua Louis Rayes
Mr. Anand Ravi Sambhwani
24-531 002-01 - Civil Appeal Docketing and Briefing Schedule Notice - Order.pdf
24-531 004-01 - Opening Brief Submitted for Filing - Brief.pdf
24-531 004-02 - Opening Brief Submitted for Filing - Certificate of Service.pdf
24-531 005-01 - Excerpts of Record Submitted for Filing - ER Vol 1.pdf
24-531 006-01 - Clerk Order - File Opening Brief with Excerpts of Record and Request Paper Copies - Order.pdf
24-531 007-01 - Motion for Miscellaneous Relief - Motion.pdf
24-531 008-01 - Excerpts of Record Submitted for Filing - ER Vol 1.pdf
24-531 011-01 - Dispositive Order - Dismiss - Order.pdf
24-531 012-01 - Mandate Issued - Mandate.pdf
Docket(#16) ORDER FILED. Michelle T. FRIEDLAND, Lawrence VANDYKE, Salvador MENDOZA, Jr. Because the mandate issued in this case on April 19, 2024, the late motion for reconsideration (Docket Entry No. 13) of the courts order dated March 28, 2024, is denied. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. [Entered: 08/01/2024 09:13 AM]
[-] Read LessDocket(#15) CORRESPONDENCE filed by Appellant Ganiyu Ayinla Jaiyeola. [COURT ENTERED FILING to correct DE 14.] [Entered: 04/29/2024 10:00 AM]
[-] Read LessDocket(#14) DEFECTIVE --- STATUS REPORT filed by Appellant Ganiyu Ayinla Jaiyeola. [Wrong filing type, correct entry is DE 15.] [Entered: 04/28/2024 05:13 PM] [Edited: 04/29/2024 10:00 AM]
[-] Read LessDocket(#13) MOTION to Reconsider Dispositive Order filed by Appellant Ganiyu Ayinla Jaiyeola. [Entered: 04/20/2024 09:56 AM]
[-] Read LessDocket(#12) MANDATE ISSUED Michelle T. FRIEDLAND, Lawrence VANDYKE, Salvador MENDOZA, Jr. [Entered: 04/19/2024 08:42 AM]
[-] Read LessDocket(#11) ORDER FILED. (Michelle T. FRIEDLAND, Lawrence VANDYKE, Salvador MENDOZA, Jr.) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the January 18, 2024 order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Bird v. Reese, 875 F.2d 256 (9th Cir. 1989) (order) (order denying a motion for default judgment is not a final appealable order); Branson v. City of Los Angeles, 912 F.2d 334, 336 (9th Cir. 1990) (denial of reconsideration of non-appealable order is itself not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [Entered: 03/28/2024 06:09 PM]
[-] Read LessDocket(#10) Paper copies (3) of Excerpts of Record submitted at DE 5 by Appellant Ganiyu Ayinla Jaiyeola received. [Entered: 03/18/2024 02:39 PM]
[-] Read LessDocket(#9) Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 4 by Appellant Ganiyu Ayinla Jaiyeola received. [Entered: 03/18/2024 02:36 PM]
[-] Read LessDocket(#8) EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant Ganiyu Ayinla Jaiyeola. --[Court entered filing on appellant's behalf due to system error preventing appellant from filing] [Entered: 03/14/2024 02:34 PM]
[-] Read LessDocket(#7) MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief (to correct excerpts of record index) filed by Appellant Ganiyu Ayinla Jaiyeola. --[Court entered filing on appellant's behalf due to system error preventing appellant from filing] [Entered: 03/14/2024 02:28 PM]
[-] Read LessDocket(#6) ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 4 by Appellant Ganiyu Ayinla Jaiyeola is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellant must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The excerpts of record submitted at DE 5 by Appellant Ganiyu Ayinla Jaiyeola are filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellant must file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white front covers. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 03/13/2024 04:00 PM]
[-] Read LessDocket(#5) EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant Ganiyu Ayinla Jaiyeola. --[Court entered filing on appellant's behalf due to system error preventing appellant from filing] [Entered: 03/13/2024 03:55 PM]
[-] Read LessDocket(#4) OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Ganiyu Ayinla Jaiyeola. --[Court entered filing on appellant's behalf due to system error preventing appellant from filing] [Entered: 03/13/2024 03:51 PM]
[-] Read LessDocket(#3) DEFECTIVE --- ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee Apple Inc..--[Filed in wrong case, correct entry is DE 24 in No. 23-4027] [Entered: 02/05/2024 08:55 PM] [Edited: 02/06/2024 11:07 AM]
[-] Read LessDocket(#2) SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 3/11/2024, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 4/10/2024. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 01/31/2024 02:19 PM]
[-] Read LessDocket(#1) CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 5:23-cv-05182-EJD has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-531 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 01/31/2024 02:13 PM]
[-] Read Less