Sixth Appellate District Court Records

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: DISMISSED BY OPINION; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS MOOT, WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO RICHARDSON ASSERTING AT FURTHER PROCEEDINGS UNDER PENAL CODE SECTION 1172.6 (AS ORDERED IN CASE NO. H052629) THAT HE IS ENTITLED TO RELIEF UNDER THAT STATUTE. (AMD, MJG, & DHB); PUBLICATION STATUS: SIGNED UNPUBLISHED; AUTHOR: DANNER, ALLISON M.; PARTICIPANTS: BROMBERG, DANIEL H. (CONCUR) GREENWOOD, MARY J. (CONCUR)

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: AFFIRMED IN FULL; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL THE JUDGMENT IS AFFIRMED. {CEW, AMD, DHB}; PUBLICATION STATUS: SIGNED UNPUBLISHED; AUTHOR: WILSON II, CHARLES E.; PARTICIPANTS: DANNER, ALLISON M. (CONCUR) BROMBERG, DANIEL H. (CONCUR)

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: REVERSED & REMANDED TO TRIAL COURT W/DIRECTIONS; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL THE ORDER IS REVERSED AND THE MATTER IS REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS TO GRANT SALINAS'S PETITION. (AMD, DHB, LRR); PUBLICATION STATUS: SIGNED UNPUBLISHED; AUTHOR: DANNER, ALLISON M.; PARTICIPANTS: BROMBERG, DANIEL H. (CONCUR) RODRIGUEZ, LISA R. (CONCUR)

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: AFFIRMED IN FULL; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL THE ORDER DENYING VALENCIANO'S PETITION FOR RESENTENCING IS AFFIRMED. (CCL, AMG, LRR*); PUBLICATION STATUS: BY THE COURT - UNPUBLISHED; AUTHOR: LIE, CYNTHIA C.; PARTICIPANTS: GROVER, ADRIENNE M. (CONCUR) RODRIGUEZ, LISA R. (CONCUR)

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: REVERSED IN FULL; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL THE JUDGMENT IS REVERSED. HU IS ENTITLED TO HIS COSTS ON APPEAL. (CCL, MJG, AMG); PUBLICATION STATUS: SIGNED PARTIAL PUBLISHED; AUTHOR: LIE, CYNTHIA C.; PARTICIPANTS: GROVER, ADRIENNE M. (CONCUR) GREENWOOD, MARY J. (CONCUR)

DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF.

DESCRIPTION: ORDER FILED.; NOTES: REBECCA FLEMING, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, HAVING NOW SUBMITTED THE RECORD ON APPEAL TO THE SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL CLERK FOR FILING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE HERETOFORE ISSUED ON SEPTEMBER 19, 2025, IS DISCHARGED.

DESCRIPTION: RECORD PURGED - TO BE SHIPPED TO STATE RECORDS CENTER.

DESCRIPTION: PETITION SUMMARILY DENIED BY ORDER; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF REVIEW IS DENIED. THE COURT FINDS THAT THERE WAS NO REASONABLE BASIS FOR THE PETITION. (SEE LAB. CODE, 5950; MARANIAN V. WORKERS' COMP. APPEALS BD. (2000) 81 CAL.APP.4TH 1068, 1074.) THE MATTER IS THEREFORE REMANDED TO THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING A SUPPLEMENTAL AWARD TO RESPONDENT ANTONINA SALAMAT FOR REASONABLE ATTORNEY'S FEES FOR SERVICES RENDERED IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PETITION. (LAB. CODE, 5801.)

DESCRIPTION: EXHIBITS RETURNED TO COUNTY CLERK.

DESCRIPTION: FILED ORDER VACATING AND APPOINTING NEW COUNSEL.; NOTES: NOTICE OF REAPPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL HAVING BEEN FILED WITH THIS COURT, THE ASSIGNMENT OF MI KIM, ATTORNEY AT LAW, TO REPRESENT APPELLANT ESPEJO IS VACATED AND MICHELLE SPENCER, SIXTH DISTRICT APPELLATE PROGRAM. 95 S. MARKET STREET, SUITE #570, SAN JOSE CA 95113, IS ASSIGNED TO REPRESENT SAID APPELLANT ON THIS APPEAL. MI KIM IS DIRECTED TO FORWARD APPELLANT'S COPY OF THE RECORD ON APPEAL TO THE ABOVE-NAMED COUNSEL FORTHWITH.

DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT'S APPENDIX AND OPENING BRIEF FILED.

DESCRIPTION: REQUESTED - EXTENSION OF TIME; NOTES: APPELLANT'S APPENDIX AND OPENING BRIEF FILED. REQUESTED FOR 12/02/2025 BY 60 DAY(S) 2ND

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: FILED AUGMENTED RECORD PURSUANT TO RULE 8.340.

DESCRIPTION: LETTER SENT TO COUNSEL RE:; NOTES: THE COURT HAVING BEEN ADVISED THAT THE TRIAL COURT IS PREPARING AN AUGMENTATION TO THE RECORD PURSUANT TO RULE 8.340, CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, TIME FOR FILING APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF IS EXTENDED TO 15 DAYS AFTER FILING OF THE AUGMENTED RECORD.

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: RECORD PURGED - TO BE SHIPPED TO STATE RECORDS CENTER.

DESCRIPTION: PETITION SUMMARILY DENIED BY ORDER; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL REAL PARTY IN INTEREST HARMONIC, INC.'S MOTION TO STRIKE PETITIONER'S REPLY BRIEF IS DENIED. (CODE OF CIV. PROC., 12A, SUBD. (A).) THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE OR OTHER APPROPRIATE RELIEF IS DENIED.

DESCRIPTION: RECORD PURGED - TO BE SHIPPED TO STATE RECORDS CENTER.

DESCRIPTION: PETITION SUMMARILY DENIED BY ORDER; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL PETITIONER SEEKS RELIEF FROM THE ORDER DENYING HIS MOTION FOR RELEASE FROM DETENTION BEFORE TRIAL. THIS ORDER WAS MADE APPROXIMATELY THREE WEEKS AFTER HIS ARREST AND ARRAIGNMENT ON THE COMPLAINT. BROADLY, HE NOW CHALLENGES THE MANNER IN WHICH THE HEARING ON THAT MOTION WAS CONDUCTED AND THE ABSENCE FROM THE RECORD OF ADEQUATE FINDINGS AND STATEMENTS OF REASONING TO SUPPORT THE DENIAL ORDER. WE NOTE THAT IF THE RECORD BEFORE THE SUPERIOR COURT REFLECTS THAT RELEASE BEFORE TRIAL MIGHT PRESENT A RISK TO VICTIM OR PUBLIC SAFETY, THAT COURT SHOULD EXPRESSLY CONSIDER WHETHER NONFINANCIAL CONDITIONS OF RELEASE MAY REASONABLY PROTECT THE COMMUNITY. (SEE IN RE HUMPHREY (2021) 11 CAL.5TH 135, 154.) AS A MATTER OF DUE PROCESS AND TO FACILITATE REVIEW, IF THAT COURT DOES DECIDE THAT DETENTION IS APPROPRIATE UNDER ARTICLE I, SECTION 12 OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION, IT MUST SET FORTH THE REASONS FOR ITS DECISION ON THE RECORD AND INCLUDE THEM IN THE MINUTES. (SEE ID. AT P. 155.) SUMMARY STATEMENTS ARE NOT SUFFICIENT. PETITIONER'S PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION OCCURRED NOT LONG AFTER HE FILED THE CURRENT PETITION IN OUR COURT. ACCORDING TO AN EXHIBIT PROVIDED WITH THE PEOPLE'S INFORMAL RESPONSE, PETITIONER WAS ARRAIGNED ON AN INFORMATION ON JUNE 20, 2022. A PERSON DETAINED IN CUSTODY BEFORE TRIAL "IS ENTITLED TO AN AUTOMATIC REVIEW OF THE ORDER FIXING THE AMOUNT OF THE BAIL . . . NOT LATER THAN FIVE DAYS FROM THE TIME OF THE ORIGINAL ORDER FIXING THE AMOUNT OF BAIL ON THE ORIGINAL ACCUSATORY PLEADING" (PEN. CODE, 1270.2), AND AN INFORMATION IS AN ORIGINAL ACCUSATORY PLEADING (SEE PEN. CODE, 949). PETITIONER HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO SEEK REVIEW OF HIS ONGOING DETENTION AFTER THE INFORMATION WAS FILED. WE NOW DECLINE TO INTERVENE BECAUSE PETITIONER HAD AN ADEQUATE ALTERNATE METHOD OF SEEKING RELIEF. (SEE IN RE CLARK (1993) 5 CAL.4TH 750, 764, FN. 3.) THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND REQUEST FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS PURSUANT TO CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 1021.5 ARE DENIED.

DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF.

DESCRIPTION: LETTER SENT ADVISING THAT AUGMENTED RECORD HAS BEEN FILED.; NOTES: THE AUGMENTED OR CORRECTED RECORD ON APPEAL IN THIS CASE WAS FILED TODAY. THE OPENING BRIEF IS DUE WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS LETTER. IN REFERRING TO THIS APPEAL, PLEASE USE THE CASE NUMBER SHOWN ABOVE.

DESCRIPTION: PETITION SUMMARILY DENIED BY ORDER; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL HAVING RECEIVED THE NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT, THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE IS DENIED AS MOOT.

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: ABANDONMENT OF APPEAL FILED IN TRIAL COURT; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL ABANDONMENT OF APPEAL FILED IN TRIAL COURT

DESCRIPTION: RECORD PURGED - TO BE SHIPPED TO STATE RECORDS CENTER.

DESCRIPTION: PETITION SUMMARILY DENIED BY ORDER; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE OR OTHER APPROPRIATE RELIEF AND THE REQUEST FOR STAY ARE DENIED.

DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF.

DESCRIPTION: GRANTED - EXTENSION OF TIME.; NOTES: APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF. DUE ON 10/08/2025 BY 30 DAY(S) 1ST

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL APPELLANT'S REQUEST TO DISMISS THE ABOVE-REFERENCED APPEAL IS GRANTED. THE APPEAL FILED ON JUNE 12, 2024, IS DISMISSED, AND THE REMITTITUR SHALL ISSUE FORTHWITH.

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD/TRANSCRIPT FILED.; NOTES: SETTLED RECORD, OR THE FINDINGS OF INABILITY TO SETTLE THE RECORD FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT.

DESCRIPTION: AUGMENTED RECORD FILED.; NOTES: REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT FROM THE HEARING ON JUNE 2, 2021, IN DEPT. 77.

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: ABANDONMENT OF APPEAL FILED IN TRIAL COURT; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF.

DESCRIPTION: REQUESTED - EXTENSION OF TIME; NOTES: APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF. REQUESTED FOR 10/24/2025 BY 30 DAY(S) 2ND

DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF.

DESCRIPTION: MOTION FILED.; NOTES: APPELLANT'S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE AND/OR CONSIDER TOGETHER CASES H053179 AND H053550 FOR BRIEFING, ARGUMENT AND DECISION.

DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF.

DESCRIPTION: GRANTED - EXTENSION OF TIME.; NOTES: APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF. DUE ON 11/03/2025 BY 32 DAY(S) 2ND

DESCRIPTION: VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL APPELLANT'S REQUEST TO DISMISS THE ABOVE-REFERENCED APPEAL IS GRANTED. THE APPEAL FILED ON NOVEMBER 28, 2023, IS DISMISSED, AND THE REMITTITUR SHALL ISSUE FORTHWITH.

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: SOMETHING IS DUE; SEE NOTE.; NOTES: THEREAFTER, ON OR BEFORE OCTOBER 10, 2025, THE PARTIES SHALL INFORM THIS COURT IN WRITING WHETHER RESPONDENT COURT HAS COMPLIED WITH THE ALTERNATIVE WRIT AND SHALL SERVE AND FILE ANY NEW ORDER ISSUED BY RESPONDENT COURT

DESCRIPTION: WRITTEN RETURN FILED.; NOTES: IF RESPONDENT COURT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE ALTERNATIVE WRIT, REAL PARTY IN INTEREST MAY FILE A WRITTEN RETURN TO THE ALTERNATIVE WRIT ON OR BEFORE OCTOBER 31, 2025.

DESCRIPTION: VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL APPELLANT'S REQUEST TO DISMISS THE ABOVE-REFERENCED APPEAL IS GRANTED. THE APPEAL FILED ON JULY 25, 2024, IS DISMISSED, AND THE REMITTITUR SHALL ISSUE FORTHWITH.

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF.

DESCRIPTION: GRANTED - EXTENSION OF TIME.; NOTES: APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF. DUE ON 10/20/2025 BY 32 DAY(S) 2ND

DESCRIPTION: ORDER FILED.; NOTES: HAVING CONSIDERED APPELLANT'S RESPONSE, THE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ISSUED AUGUST 20, 2025, IS DISCHARGED. THE APPEAL SHALL PROCEED.

DESCRIPTION: NOTE:

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: OSC ISSUE ON COURT REPORTER RE: UNFILED RECORD.; NOTES: C.S.R. PATRICK CROWLEY, 2ND REX FOR ROS **NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS**

DESCRIPTION: OSC ISSUE ON COURT REPORTER RE: UNFILED RECORD.; NOTES: C.S.R. STACIE THOMAS

DESCRIPTION: RECORD PURGED - TO BE SHIPPED TO STATE RECORDS CENTER.

DESCRIPTION: PETITION SUMMARILY DENIED BY ORDER; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE, OR OTHER APPROPRIATE RELIEF IS DENIED. THE REQUEST TO FILE THE PETITION AND EXHIBITS UNDER SEAL IS GRANTED.

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: RECORD PURGED - TO BE SHIPPED TO STATE RECORDS CENTER.

DESCRIPTION: PETITION SUMMARILY DENIED BY ORDER; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL

DESCRIPTION: RECORD PURGED - TO BE SHIPPED TO STATE RECORDS CENTER.

DESCRIPTION: PETITION SUMMARILY DENIED BY ORDER; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND APPLICATION FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE ARE DENIED. FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE TRIAL COURT AND COUNSEL, THIS COURT NOTES THAT THERE HAS BEEN A CHANGE IN LAW GOVERNING THE CIRCUMSTANCES UNDER WHICH A PERSON ACCUSED OF A PROBATION VIOLATION IS ENTITLED TO RELEASE FROM PHYSICAL CUSTODY PENDING A FORMAL PROBATION VIOLATION HEARING. ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 1228 (2021-2022 REG. SESS.) AMENDED PENAL CODE SECTION 1203.2 AND ADDED PENAL CODE SECTION 1203.25, EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2022. AS RELEVANT HERE, THE AMENDMENT TO SECTION 1203.2 REQUIRES THE TRIAL COURT TO "CONSIDER THE RELEASE OF A PERSON ON PROBATION FROM CUSTODY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 1203.25" WHENEVER A PROBATIONER "IS ARRESTED, WITH OR WITHOUT A WARRANT OR THE FILING OF A PETITION FOR REVOCATION," UNLESS THAT PERSON IS ALREADY SERVING A PERIOD OF FLASH INCARCERATION. (PEN. CODE, 1203.2, SUBD. (A).) PENAL CODE SECTION 1203.25 PROVIDES THAT ALL PROBATIONERS RELEASED FROM PHYSICAL CUSTODY AT OR AFTER THE INITIAL ARRAIGNMENT HEARING AND PRIOR TO THE FORMAL PROBATION VIOLATION HEARING SHALL BE RELEASED ON THEIR OWN RECOGNIZANCE, UNLESS THE TRIAL COURT "FINDS, BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE, THAT THE PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE REQUIRE THE IMPOSITION OF AN ORDER TO PROVIDE REASONABLE PROTECTION TO THE PUBLIC AND REASONABLE ASSURANCE OF THE PERSON'S FUTURE APPEARANCE IN COURT." (PEN. CODE, 1203.25, SUBD. (A).) THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND APPLICATION FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE ARE DENIED. FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE TRIAL COURT AND COUNSEL, THIS COURT NOTES THAT THERE HAS BEEN A CHANGE IN LAW GOVERNING THE CIRCUMSTANCES UNDER WHICH A PERSON ACCUSED OF A PROBATION VIOLATION IS ENTITLED TO RELEASE FROM PHYSICAL CUSTODY PENDING A FORMAL PROBATION VIOLATION HEARING. ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 1228 (2021-2022 REG. SESS.) AMENDED PENAL CODE SECTION 1203.2 AND ADDED PENAL CODE SECTION 1203.25, EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2022. AS RELEVANT HERE, THE AMENDMENT TO SECTION 1203.2 REQUIRES THE TRIAL COURT TO "CONSIDER THE RELEASE OF A PERSON ON PROBATION FROM CUSTODY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 1203.25" WHENEVER A PROBATIONER "IS ARRESTED, WITH OR WITHOUT A WARRANT OR THE FILING OF A PETITION FOR REVOCATION," UNLESS THAT PERSON IS ALREADY SERVING A PERIOD OF FLASH INCARCERATION. (PEN. CODE, 1203.2, SUBD. (A).) PENAL CODE SECTION 1203.25 PROVIDES THAT ALL PROBATIONERS RELEASED FROM PHYSICAL CUSTODY AT OR AFTER THE INITIAL ARRAIGNMENT HEARING AND PRIOR TO THE FORMAL PROBATION VIOLATION HEARING SHALL BE RELEASED ON THEIR OWN RECOGNIZANCE, UNLESS THE TRIAL COURT "FINDS, BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE, THAT THE PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE REQUIRE THE IMPOSITION OF AN ORDER TO PROVIDE REASONABLE PROTECTION TO THE PUBLIC AND REASONABLE ASSURANCE OF THE PERSON'S FUTURE APPEARANCE IN COURT." (PEN. CODE, 1203.25, SUBD. (A).)

DESCRIPTION: FILED SUPREME COURT REMITTITUR WITH OPINION.

DESCRIPTION: PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED IN SUPREME COURT.; NOTES: THE PETITION FOR REVIEW IS GRANTED. FURTHER ACTION IN THIS MATTER IS DEFERRED PENDING CONSIDERATION AND DISPOSITION OF A RELATED ISSUE IN IN RE MONTGOMERY, S287339 (SEE CAL. RULES OF COURT, RULE 8.512(D)(2)), OR PENDING FURTHER ORDER OF THE COURT. SUBMISSION OF ADDITIONAL BRIEFING, PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULE 8.520, IS DEFERRED PENDING FURTHER ORDER OF THE COURT.

DESCRIPTION: NOTE:; NOTES: NO RESPONSE BY RESPONDENT TO OSC ISSUED TO APPELLANT.

DESCRIPTION: CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT FILED*********

DESCRIPTION: LITIGANT DECLARED VEXATIOUS; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL APPELLANT'S REQUEST TO FILE NEW LITIGATION BY VEXATIOUS LITIGANT IS DENIED. THE NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED NOVEMBER 20, 2024 IS DISMISSED.

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: ABATEMENT OF APPEAL; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL THE COURT HAVING LEARNED THAT APPELLANT IS DECEASED, THE CAUSE IS ORDERED PERMANENTLY ABATED AND DISMISSED. THE SUPERIOR COURT IS DIRECTED TO ENTER ITS ORDER TO THAT EFFECT.

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: ABANDONMENT OF APPEAL FILED IN TRIAL COURT; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL ABA FILED BY APPELLANT ON 10/11/2023.

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.